[clug-talk] Why is Software Assurance so bad.
xlr8me at gmail.com
Tue May 23 08:06:13 PDT 2006
Finding credible resources might be difficult.
Finding unbiased credible resources might be even harder.
Try starting here [ http://www.cio.com/sponsors/091503ms/complete.pdf ] and
doing a standard cost-benefit analysis for your company. Lay it down in
clear numbers based on your particular company's usage.
On 5/23/06, Roy Souther <roy at silicontao.com> wrote:
> I need help. This guy I work with is trying to spend tons of money to buy
> M$ Software Assurance in the hope that some how Vista will run on systems
> that can barely run XP.
> I need URL's for real reason not to buy M$ Software Assurance. As most of
> us already know, M$ is only trying to get more money out of people with
> *Royce Souther <roy at SiliconTao.com>*
> Let Open Source help your business move beyond.
> For security this message is digitally authenticated by *GnuPG<http://www.gnupg.org>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> clug-talk mailing list
> clug-talk at clug.ca
> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> **Please remove these lines when replying
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the clug-talk