[clug-talk] PL/PGSQL functions

[Shawn]

Aiming for compact and efficient code is usually a good thing.  But sometimes 
the "eloquent" solution is just not as easy to understand 6 months later, and 
doesn't really buy that much in terms of performance.  Troubleshooting 
someone else's code, or even your own a year or so after the fact helps drive 
this home.  :)  (but good commenting helps)

Shawn

On Monday 24 October 2005 23:28, Cirez Communications, inc. wrote:
> Thanks a bunch for the info...I guess I would leave things the way
> they are. The code is not as compact as I would like; but it minimizes
> the risks....
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://clug.ca/pipermail/clug-talk_clug.ca/attachments/20051025/c1b61201/attachment.bin