Dwayne C. Litzenberger
dlitz9734 at dlitz.net
Tue Mar 22 22:02:14 PST 2005
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:29:38AM -0700, Martin Glazer wrote:
>I'm due to give a talk next month to a group new entrepreneurs and small
>business owners. I would like to introduce them to Linux and explain how
>they can benefit from the use of open source software.
Let's say that you rely on Program X to carry out your day-to-day business.
Now assume that something about your business changes, and Program X no
longer does exactly what you need it to do. You need to change the way
Program X functions. If your supplier for Program X anticipated your
needs, then the cost of making the change is relatively small, since you
only need to change Program X's configuration. But what if Program X
doesn't already have the ability to do what you want? You need a custom
change. How much will that cost?
If Program X is proprietary software, the cost of changing it depends on
the program's vendor. If the vendor cooperates with you to get you the
changes you need in a reasonable amount of time at a reasonable cost, then
your costs are relatively little. However, if the vendor does not
cooperate -- such as if they demand that you first "upgrade" to Program Y
(which requires new hardware, a new proprietary operating system, etc) or
if you are simply too small for them to care about your specific needs --
then the cost of changing Program X skyrockets: You have to hire one or
more expensive genius-programmers to reverse-engineer Program X and
implement your changes, or you have to hire someone to re-implement large
portions of Program X from scratch, or maybe you just can't afford it and
you go out of business.
With free software, free-market economics govern the cost of changing
Program X to your specifications: You can hire anyone you want to change
Program X, and there is no point where an uncooperative vendor causes
your costs to skyrocket. You also get to maximize the value of your
existing information infrastructure, since you have the ability to weigh
the cost of maintaining your existing software/hardware against the cost of
converting to new software/hardware. Also, since all of your programs and
data formats are open, the cost of converting to new software/hardware is
similarly governed by free-market economics.
Probably the main advantage of free software is the freedom, and the
cost-normalizing effect that this freedom has. Free software is governed
by free-market economics. Proprietary software, where every vendor has a
monopoly on its software, is governed by monopoly economics.
What kind of economics do you think are better for you, the consumer?
Dwayne C. Litzenberger <dlitz at dlitz.net>
This message contains an OpenPGP/MIME signature, which can be used to verify
its authenticity. If the message itself appears as an attachment, you are
probably using using a broken mail program, such as Microsoft Outlook Express.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : /pipermail/clug-talk_clug.ca/attachments/20050323/25d6ee2e/attachment.bin
More information about the clug-talk