[clug-talk] Microsoft to Sue linux users
kMajor at gov.mdrockyview.ab.ca
kMajor at gov.mdrockyview.ab.ca
Tue Nov 30 08:52:46 PST 2004
First off I apologize - I snipped too much :)
I was responding to Niels comment "I have no idea how this nonsense made it to the list" in response to the creator of this thread.
I guess I was just trying remind Niels of what he had stated in the past ...
>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:22:58 -0800
>Sorry, but I respectfully disagree: Dialog does not suck.
>Open dialog is a good thing, especially in a community where "open" is generally a positive >thing.
I also wanted to bring forward the discussion of what should and should not be let through... what are the guidelines? There are none as far as I know except for size (which Jarrod has responded to in another email) so why let anything through? I guess that is for the moderator to decide but if he/she has no criteria - then how can that decision be made effectively and objectively.
I want to express here that I completely disagree with 'Tom' - however I am only able to express my opinion on his email because it was allowed through to the list.
These recent events should maybe open a discussion about the posting or not posting an unsubscribed/unauthorized mail to the list.
Just opening a dialogue :-) not sending barbs at anyone - and I agree no wrong doing... just seems that the guidelines of the mailing list need to be broadened to include what to do with what is awaiting the moderator
> -----Original Message-----
> From: clug-talk-bounces at clug.ca [mailto:clug-talk-bounces at clug.ca]On
> Behalf Of Shawn
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 9:06 AM
> To: CLUG General
> Subject: Re: [clug-talk] Microsoft to Sue linux users
> Kari, I think you missed the meaning of the messages. There
> is no "censoring"
> going on at all. But the way the mailing list works, messages from
> non-members will be put aside until a list administrator (or
> moderator for
> lack of better words) can take a look at them and allow them through.
> This is not censoring at all. It's hardly even moderating of
> the list. It's
> simply an administrative setting that prevents spam from
> flooding the list.
> Only email addresses that have signed up can post to the
> list. Some of us
> have multiple addresses and will occasionally post to the
> list from one that
> is not signed up on the list. These messages are not simply
> discarded but
> set aside for review.
> Jarrod's message was indicating that he had handled these
> messages the list
> software had set aside, and one of Kevin's legitimate
> messages was in the
> list. Neils simply was making light of the issue and doing a quasi
> comparison of Jarrod's role in this to that of a SlashDot moderator.
> There is no wrong doing here...
> My apologies if it's ME who is mis-reading the tone of your
> message. :)
> On Tuesday 30 November 2004 08:31, kMajor at gov.mdrockyview.ab.ca wrote:
> > I must admit that I am shocked at both of you
> > Niels - you were one of the many who stated that the
> Executive had no right
> > to stop a conversation. I took that to mean ANY
> conversation not just the
> > ones that you agreed with.
> > Jarrod - I believe that the Exec have no right to sensor
> mail posted to the
> > list unless it is obvious spam or vulgar or in any way
> discriminating to
> > race, colour, creed, etc.
> > This is a free and open list just like the software and the
> movement we all
> > claim to extol.
> > As always this is just my 2 cents and its probably not even
> worth that -
> > but I did not want to sit back and have people say it was
> OK to sensor mail
> > for context/content.
> > Kari
> clug-talk mailing list
> clug-talk at clug.ca
> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> **Please remove these lines when replying
More information about the clug-talk