[clug-talk] Microsoft to Sue linux users

Shawn sgrover at open2space.com
Tue Nov 30 08:06:08 PST 2004

Kari, I think you missed the meaning of the messages.  There is no "censoring" 
going on at all.  But the way the mailing list works, messages from 
non-members will be put aside until a list administrator (or moderator for 
lack of better words) can take a look at them and allow them through.

This is not censoring at all.  It's hardly even moderating of the list.  It's 
simply an administrative setting that prevents spam from flooding the list. 
Only email addresses that have signed up can post to the list.  Some of us 
have multiple addresses and will occasionally post to the list from one that 
is not signed up on the list.  These messages are not simply discarded but 
set aside for review.  

Jarrod's message was indicating that he had handled these messages the list 
software had set aside, and one of Kevin's legitimate messages was in the 
list.  Neils simply was making light of the issue and doing a quasi 
comparison of Jarrod's role in this to that of a SlashDot moderator.

There is no wrong doing here...

My apologies if it's ME who is mis-reading the tone of your message. :)


On Tuesday 30 November 2004 08:31, kMajor at gov.mdrockyview.ab.ca wrote:
> I must admit that I am shocked at both of you
> Niels - you were one of the many who stated that the Executive had no right
> to stop a conversation.  I took that to mean ANY conversation not just the
> ones that you agreed with.
> Jarrod - I believe that the Exec have no right to sensor mail posted to the
> list unless it is obvious spam or vulgar or in any way discriminating to
> race, colour, creed, etc.
> This is a free and open list just like the software and the movement we all
> claim to extol.
> As always this is just my 2 cents and its probably not even worth that -
> but I did not want to sit back and have people say it was OK to sensor mail
> for context/content.
> Kari

More information about the clug-talk mailing list