[clug-talk] Tar file

Michael Petch mpetch at capp-sysware.com
Thu Nov 18 02:45:46 PST 2004

After dealing with oracle on Linux platforms it is funny, I concluded
that ORACLE has poor dependency and installation support - and I don't
fault Redhat for the way Oracle is shipped/distributed.

Why not go ask all the software suppliers? (oracle etc). Maybe they
should reconsider how their software is installed.

I saw a message about sand boxing. That is the method I recommend if
your dealing with Oracle. Can be as easy as using chroot on some

On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 18:12 -0700, Kevin Anderson wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 November 2004 16:53, Jesse Kline wrote:
> > When Red Hat split their product line, they basically said that Fedora
> > was more of a testing distro. for people who want the latest software.
> > If you're a company running this on a server, you want something that is
> > rock solid, has a long release cycle, and is easy to upgrade. As far as
> > I'm concerned that's what Debian is, and it's free. Their stable
> > distribution is known for being stable, which is what you should be
> > looking for on a server IMHO. It has a long release cycle so you don't
> > have to worry about upgrading your OS every 6 months in order to
> > maintain patches. As well, it is easy to upgrade using apt. Just like
> > rh, if you want the latest and greatest to play around with you can
> > install testing or unstable. I think this is the heritage that they're
> > proud of.
> As they should be.  Too bad Oracle, Peoplesoft, etc don't agree.  Again and 
> again, Linux is the word used where Red Hat is the what they really mean.  
> Which makes it unsuitable for a corporate install.  Every time I've purchased 
> a big app, RH was requested as the OS.  Red Hat isn't Linux, but nobody seems 
> to know that except in the technical realm.  
> Maybe I hate RH because it's just thrown at me so often.  Linux should allow 
> choice, but it doesn't.  If you want support on an application, you need to 
> be running a particular OS under it.  Regardless of the suitability of 
> another identical OS.  Whitebox is a great example.  Try to get support for 
> Oracle on an install built on whitebox even...
> Kev.
> _______________________________________________
> clug-talk mailing list
> clug-talk at clug.ca
> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> **Please remove these lines when replying
Michael Petch <mpetch at capp-sysware.com>
CApp::Sysware Consulting Ltd.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : /pipermail/clug-talk_clug.ca/attachments/20041118/5903755d/attachment-0001.bin

More information about the clug-talk mailing list